http://www.dangerpress.com/its-an-inkjet-print/ Fine screen printing, design & illustration. Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:21:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://www.dangerpress.com/its-an-inkjet-print/#comment-153 J.Danger Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:21:21 +0000 http://www.dangerpress.com/?p=516#comment-153 Some good points here. It's the price they often go for that's offensive. The medium isn't all bad. Some good points here. It’s the price they often go for that’s offensive. The medium isn’t all bad.

]]> http://www.dangerpress.com/its-an-inkjet-print/#comment-152 shawn Mon, 30 Jan 2012 06:54:05 +0000 http://www.dangerpress.com/?p=516#comment-152 I can understand the stance some take against ink-jet prints and digital made art in general because I was once on their side. Since then I have dived into the world, understanding the process, and producing art with programs and ink-jet printers. Now I think that most people who are so angry at the idea of ink-jet printed works are usually just ignorant and scared of being obsolete. Good art will always be put under a microscope and any medium doesn't just equal art. To say ink-jet prints are printed on good paper to justify themselves is stupid. Every artist in every medium is likely to use the best materials possibly if they want it to last. The standard isn't paint on cardboard or pressed etchings on napkins. Rolling your eyes at the thought, knowledge, and work it takes to produce art just because of the medium is a mistake made all the time by critics out of the loop. And to sum up what someone can do with digital art and ink-jet as "made via File > Print" is like saying a photographer just presses a button. I can understand the stance some take against ink-jet prints and digital made art in general because I was once on their side. Since then I have dived into the world, understanding the process, and producing art with programs and ink-jet printers. Now I think that most people who are so angry at the idea of ink-jet printed works are usually just ignorant and scared of being obsolete. Good art will always be put under a microscope and any medium doesn’t just equal art. To say ink-jet prints are printed on good paper to justify themselves is stupid. Every artist in every medium is likely to use the best materials possibly if they want it to last. The standard isn’t paint on cardboard or pressed etchings on napkins. Rolling your eyes at the thought, knowledge, and work it takes to produce art just because of the medium is a mistake made all the time by critics out of the loop. And to sum up what someone can do with digital art and ink-jet as “made via File > Print” is like saying a photographer just presses a button.

]]> http://www.dangerpress.com/its-an-inkjet-print/#comment-55 Carla Kaiser Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:57:33 +0000 http://www.dangerpress.com/?p=516#comment-55 Ha. Thanks for clearing this up for me. I've been wondering what the hell giclee prints are all about. Ha. Thanks for clearing this up for me. I’ve been wondering what the hell giclee prints are all about.

]]> http://www.dangerpress.com/its-an-inkjet-print/#comment-50 kip Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:14:25 +0000 http://www.dangerpress.com/?p=516#comment-50 Is that an épson printing press? Is that an épson printing press?

]]> http://www.dangerpress.com/its-an-inkjet-print/#comment-48 dusty Sat, 02 Jan 2010 23:04:39 +0000 http://www.dangerpress.com/?p=516#comment-48 http://www.merriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/audio.pl?presti01=prestidigitation http://www.merriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/audio.pl?presti01=prestidigitation

]]>